What is in the box, what it reads, how fast it answers, and what it does on your network.
Two pages, the same figures, printable for whoever has to sign it off.
Everything becomes a citable chunk. Only the locator differs: a page for documents, a timestamp range for audio, the filename for a photograph, and a sheet and zone for a drawing. Rows marked shipping soon are not in the software yet.
Measured in our testing lab, over a corpus of machine manuals, shift-handover voice notes and nameplate photographs, and not on the appliance above. We measure again on your own documents once it is running, rather than asking you to trust ours.
The obvious choice was a 4B reasoning model. It lost, and the margin is the reason the appliance feels fast. Fifteen synthesis questions, same corpus, same hardware.
| Model | Median | Over 5 s | Grounded | Cited | Refused correctly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4B reasoning, terse prompt | 16.2 s | 15/15 | 12/15 | 14/15 | 5/5 |
| 3B, terse prompt | 3.4 s | 2/15 | 12/15 | 4/15 | 5/5 |
| 3B, terse + schema | 1.4 s | 0/15 | 12/15 | 15/15 | 5/5 |
Identical grounding, twelve times faster, and the citation rate goes from 4 of 15 to 15 of 15. Asking for citations in the prompt produced them a quarter of the time; requiring a response schema with a non-empty citations array produced them every time. The model cannot return an answer without saying where it came from. That is a structural guarantee rather than a well-worded request.
The question worth asking is not whether the unit is on a network. It has to be, or nobody could ask it anything. It is which direction the connections go. The appliance listens; it never dials.
If a number you need is missing, ask for it. We would rather send you a measurement than a brochure.